_fw.png)
HAMPTON COMMERCIAL TRASH V. HAMPTON PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS - TRUTH BOMB TUESDAY
- NH Muckraker
- 20 hours ago
- 3 min read
Updated: 17 hours ago
HAMPTON TRASH V HAMPTON PROPERTY TAXES
TRUTH BOMB VIDEO HERE
Property taxes.
Mitch Vexler is headed to SCOTUS
RE: FRAUDULENT PROPERTY TAXES
The way they do it in New Hampshire, they look at sales and building permits and make up a number for homes that have NOT sold.
A tax on unrealized gains.
Taxation without representation.
Taxpayers filed a lawsuit in Hampton regarding rigged and unequal, tea party, property tax assessments, this was after trying to explain in the form of a complaint to the selectmen, the governor, legislative leaders, and the NH Attorney general. Taxpayers included the mathematical proof, that assessments were done unequally and without accurate property data in many cases, this was also shown later in a NH Board of Tax and Land Appeals Order on the town, filed by other taxpayers of Hampton.
To date, taxpayers have been dismissed by New Hampshire's Rockingham County Superior Court and are now on appeal to the NH Supreme Court.
Here is the latest regarding our case. We are pro-se litigants - Regina Barnes-Player and Albert Kruschwitz.
1. Taxpayers respond to towns motion to strike evidence.
Hampton's latest move in the property-tax battle is breathtaking: instead of answering the legal question, the Town wants the New Hampshire Supreme Court to strike the argument raising it.
The taxpayers' supplemental argument does not invent a new lawsuit or sneak a new issue into the appeal. It goes straight back to the original question raised in Rockingham County Superior Court: Did Hampton actually have lawful authority to impose property taxes using the valuation framework it employed? https://www.lapennaliberta.com/post/when-you-can-t-defend-the-tax-strike-the-evidence-hampton-s-latest-move-exposed
2. NEW HAMPSHIRE’S GOVERNMENTAL TRAIN WRECK: TAXPAYERS PROVE UNEQUAL TAXATION—AND THE SYSTEM TELLS THEM TO WAIT UNTIL SEPTEMBER
What happens when ordinary taxpayers believe they can demonstrate that their municipality failed to follow legally required property-valuation procedures—and the government’s response is not to fix the problem, but to send them on a legal merry-go-round? https://www.lapennaliberta.com/post/taxed-tossed-told-to-wait-new-hampshire-s-broken-tax-justice-system
3. The Legislature established the legal predicate for property taxation in RSA 75:8-a by requiring municipalities to assess property at full and true value. That statutory requirement is the foundation of lawful taxation. Before a municipality may impose property taxes, it must first satisfy the valuation standard the Legislature enacted. The legal question is not whether statistical methods are useful; it is whether the methodology employed is legally capable of satisfying the Legislature's explicit requirement.
The DRA later adopted administrative rules recognizing both full revaluations and full statistical revaluations as separate valuation methodologies. Those rules define fundamentally different processes. A full revaluation requires a comprehensive measure and listing of all properties and the establishment of current full and true value. A statistical revaluation, by contrast, relies primarily on existing property data, statistical analysis, and valuation models rather than a complete physical revaluation of every property. https://www.lapennaliberta.com/post/how-can-a-state-adminstrative-rule-expand-or-alter-what-has-been-authorized-by-the-elected-new-hamps
4. The Town of Hampton continues to perform legal gymnastics, smoke-screening the public with arguments about reassessments, abatements, tax bills, and appraisal methodology. But none of that answers the one question at the heart of this case. https://www.lapennaliberta.com/post/the-75-million-question-hampton-refuses-to-answer
AND
5. This case isn’t about routine tax complaints—it’s a direct challenge to whether the Town of Hampton, New Hampshire had any legal authority to tax its residents in the first place. The appellants argue the Town imposed 2024 property taxes without meeting the most basic legal requirements for a valid valuation—no complete inspections, unreliable or outdated data, and a flawed mass appraisal process. Instead of confronting that head-on, the lower court brushed past it, recasting the case as a standard reassessment and tax abatement dispute. That maneuver allowed the court to dismiss everything on technicalities—deadlines and procedural rules—without ever answering the central question: were these taxes lawful at all?
Did the Town ever have the legal authority to replace the statutory and constitutional requirements for a lawful property valuation with a statistical computer model instead of conducting a complete physical reassessment? https://www.lapennaliberta.com/post/hampton-new-hampshire-faces-showdown-in-state-supreme-court-over-lawfulness-of-property-taxes
As a lifer from Hampton and a former selectman, I can attest that most everything that happens in the town is either corrupt or includes some form of deception regarding accountability to taxpayers. It is mostly all run by local special interests; the local chamber of commerce, local unions (mostly the school unions), town department heads, town management, and now, thanks to the democrats, the Hampton Democrats. Since I was ousted from the Board of Selectmen, this town has gone from moderate progressive to far left woke and no one seems to tell the complete truth or be accountable for anything.
Hampton, New Hampshire taxpayers would be genuinely grateful if you could acknowledge our efforts and share them nationally. Everyone deserves to know what is happening. Property taxes are unconstitutional and a taxation without representation. That is exactly what taxpayers argued at the January 2026 Rockingham County Superior Court Hearing. https://youtu.be/heFS6u6RsyM?si=fwIk7NnAPelWsUi7
Comments