_fw.png)
NEW HAMPSHIRE PROPERTY TAXES, JUST A GUESSING GAME, LOTS OF TALK AND NO ACTION BY CONCORD. MEANWHILE THE HTG TAKES THE LOCAL INTIATIVE
- NH Muckraker
- 22 minutes ago
- 2 min read
Judicial Watch is actually doing the work — suing, FOIA-ing, and cleaning 6.8 million bad names off voter rolls nationwide.
Meanwhile, what has the NH GOP done?
A whole lot of talking. Very little acting.
No House vote.
No Senate vote.
No order forcing Secretary of State Scanlan to turn over election records to AG Pam Bondi.
Just endless campaigning — always about the next election, never about fixing the system.
And while they stall, taxpayers are being robbed.
New Hampshire property taxes are being calculated on fictional wealth — “unrealized gains” — based on lazy math and barely any physical inspections.
It’s not assessment. It’s guesswork.
This isn’t just bad policy — it’s a 250-year betrayal.
The Declaration of Independence tells us exactly what to do when government becomes abusive:
When a pattern of abuses reveals a plan toward tyranny, the people have the right — and the duty — to resist.
Not later.
Not after another rigged election.
Now.
Hampton Taxpayer Group (HTG) takes the initiative locally.
Some key points to know from the 1.18.26 HTG meeting.
The current system of property taxation—specifically the use of so-called “market value” by assessors—is unconstitutional, unjust, and mathematically indefensible. It operates by taxing citizens on a fictional amount of income that does not exist, as though a property has been sold when it has not. This is, in effect, the taxation of unrealized gains, something expressly prohibited in both constitutional principle and valuation law.
Mitch Vexler - Mockingbird Properties, has already communicated these findings directly to President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. This issue is known at the highest levels. What remains is the political and legal courage to act.
What we exposed last night is that the reported assessed value of the town and its ratios coming back from Concord (Dept of Revenue [DRA]) to set the tax rate does not agree and appears to be much lower than the total assessed value of the town as shown in the plaintiff's created tax map using town and DRA reports filed to set the tax rate. The difference was approximately unreported $561 million in townwide valuation and an additional $7.1 million in property tax. It appears the numbers were changed by DRA. Was the increase in taxes due to both inflated valuations and gluttonous spending by the town, determined to be too high by DRA to be recognized in just one year?
Plaintiffs had to create a town tax map, the one shown on the town website is dated April 1, 2013. The plaintiff created map as shown, supports a townwide valuation of $6,641,542,320 versus the reported (less exemptions) valuation of $6,080,901,300. Taxes on $6.6 billion in valuation would be an estimated $81,823,801 NOT the reported $74,701,796, a difference of $7,122,005 in taxes raised.
1.18.26 meeting slide show
VIDEO COMING.
